-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
PACs Boosted by Supreme1 Court Ruling
The contest for control of the White House is not limited to just the presidential candidates' own campaigns. There are also outside groups that want to affect the results of the election. And in the 2012 presidential race, these groups have been given significantly expanded freedoms to influence the outcome.
The U.S. Supreme Court decided2 two cases in 2010 that greatly changed the U.S. political landscape. The Supreme Court agreed with two groups, Citizens United and Speech Now, that existing regulations by the Federal Election Commission went against the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment3 guarantee of free speech.
But the Court's decisions opened up more than just free speech, as FEC Chairwoman Cynthia Bauerly explains:
"It struck down, specifically, a prohibition4 on corporations being able to spend independently, make electioneering communications, or independent expenditures5, on behalf of a candidate," said Bauerly.
The Supreme Court rulings affected6 laws and regulations meant to prevent companies, or unions, or very wealthy individuals from essentially7 overwhelming the political process with their cash. Today, these rulings have helped to create powerful outside political action committees, or "Super PACS," as noted9 by Politico newspaper's David Levinthal.
"So what is different is that corporations, unions, and other special interests could spend as much money as they ever could want to, to give to new types of political organizations that, in turn, could themselves spend and raise unlimited10 sums of money," said Levinthal.
As of April this year, Republican presidential candidate Mitt8 Romney's campaign committee reported contributions top $86 million. At the same time, a pro-Romney Super PAC called "Restore Our Future" reported bringing in nearly $52 million.
By comparison, President Obama's re-election campaign reported raising almost $200 million by that date.
Federal regulations say these PACS cannot coordinate11 their operations with candidates' campaigns. But one political consultant12 who works with Democrats13, Peter Fenn, says the reality is different.
"Most of these so-called independent groups are not independent at all," said Fenn. "They may not be working on direct orders from the candidate or the party, but they know what the issues are. They are part and parcel of the campaign."
While some decry14 the Supreme Court's decisions and the rise of these Super PACS, others say both parties, and these political committees, have equal opportunities to raise money. And, they say, voters won't be swayed by these outside groups.
"At the end of the day, they're [voters] going to look at a political ad and they are primarily going to judge that ad by its content, not by who is pushing it, or by the rules that created a playing field for the ad to exist in the first place," noted Roll Call newspaper reporter David Drucker.
Some observers say that by the November election, these outside PACs may well raise and spend more money than the candidates' own campaign committees, and will continue to do so in future elections.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 expenditures | |
n.花费( expenditure的名词复数 );使用;(尤指金钱的)支出额;(精力、时间、材料等的)耗费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mitt | |
n.棒球手套,拳击手套,无指手套;vt.铐住,握手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 coordinate | |
adj.同等的,协调的;n.同等者;vt.协作,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 consultant | |
n.顾问;会诊医师,专科医生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 decry | |
v.危难,谴责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|