-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Reported US Surveillance of Pakistan’s Nuclear Program Raises Questions
WASHINGTON — A recent Washington Post article reporting that the United States has stepped up surveillance of Pakistan's nuclear program has once again raised questions about the bilateral1 relationship between Washington and Islambad. The reported surveillance has focused new attention on the issue of mutual2 trust in the U.S.-Pakistan relationship.
Pakistan has always maintained its nuclear arms are totally secure and has rejected any suggestion they could fall into the wrong hands.
But the recent Post article based on what it said are classified documents reported that Washington has increased surveillance of Pakistan’s nuclear arms.
Does this reflect U.S. distrust of Pakistan?
"The United States helps Pakistan to establish frames of reference and abilities to safeguard material, but then, at the same time, there is not the same kind of transparency to allow the United States to go in and verify those activities," said Thomas Lynch, a Distinguished3 Research Fellow at the National Defense4 University in Washington D.C. So, the United States, being a large country, doing the same things that it does with other countries with nuclear programs, expends5 capital and expends energy to determine if the assistance is having the desired effect."
But he adds such reports are bound to raise concerns in Islamabad over U.S. intentions towards Pakistan’s nuclear program.
"I think most American policymakers recognize that in Pakistan, this kind of activity gets morphed into a dramatic worry that the United States is spying on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in order to take them or eliminate them," LYnch said. "That fear is understandable, but it is quite overblown."
After the story appeared in the Post, Pakistan reiterated6 that the command and control structure of its nuclear program is completely safe. Experts say while there may be some distrust in U.S.-Pakistan relations, the two countries are united by vital common interests.
"Mutual interests are prevalent throughout the spectrum," said Aqab Malik, who is a Carnegie Fellow at the New America Foundation. "And it’s about balancing those interests with the negative threats that may emanate7 from each side. It’s a balancing act. And overall strategic interest is much greater than the threats against each other."
And Malik is optimistic about the direction of the U.S.-Pakistan relations.
"Pakistan and the United States have established strategic dialogue again. They reinitiated it," he said. ?The new government wants to facilitate better relationships with Afghanistan and India, as well as the United States and other countries."
Analysts8 stress that eliminating threats from militants9 and ensuring the safety of U.S. troops as they withdraw from Afghanistan should be the main priority for Washington and Islamabad.
1 bilateral | |
adj.双方的,两边的,两侧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 expends | |
v.花费( expend的第三人称单数 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 emanate | |
v.发自,来自,出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 militants | |
激进分子,好斗分子( militant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|