-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Obamacare, gay marriage and race: the justices' term is heating up
TWO years ago Obamacare survived a constitutional assault by the narrowest of margins3, but its opponents have not given up. On November 7th the Supreme Court agreed to hear another challenge which, if upheld, could gut4 the president's health-care law.
In King v Burwell the challengers are demanding that Obamacare be enforced as it was written. Since it was badly written—Congress passed a shoddy and confusing first draft, which Barack Obama signed—this could cause problems. The law specifies5 that subsidies6 will be available to people who buy their health insurance on an exchange “established by the State”. At the time, Democrats7 assumed that the states would all set up exchanges, but 27 refused to do so. Mr Obama got round this by setting up a federal exchange and offering subsidies through that, too. The plaintiffs say such subsidies are illegal.
The administration argues that Congress never intended to doom8 its own law with a four-word time bomb. Over 5m Americans have bought their policies via federal exchanges. If the justices strike down their subsidies, millions could lose coverage9, or have to pay more for it out of their own pockets. The court will hear the case early next year and rule by June.
Gay marriage may also soon arrive on the justices' docket. On November 6th the Sixth Circuit became the first federal appellate court to uphold a state ban on gay marriage. Four circuits have nullified similar bans in recent months, so the new ruling creates a split. Are same-sex marriage bans compatible with the Constitution's guarantee of “the equal protection of the laws”? Only the Supreme Court can settle the matter. It may do so next year.
On November 12th the Supremes heard a tricky10 case involving race and gerrymandering. The Alabama Legislative11 Black Caucus12 and the Alabama Democratic Conference claim that the Republican-controlled Alabama legislature violated the 14th Amendment13 (the equal protection clause, again) when it redrew electoral boundaries in 2012. The new map, the appellees argue, stuffed more blacks into areas where blacks already outnumbered whites, creating districts with black supermajorities topping 70% and solidifying14 the Republican Party's hold on other districts.
Both sides have been opportunistic. Democrats are now railing against Alabama for using “rigid racial targets” in redistricting. Yet it was they who insisted that the state create the majority-black districts in 2001, to boost black voting power. Justice Antonin Scalia said to Richard Pildes, a lawyer for the appellants: “You're making the argument that the opponents of black plaintiffs used to make here.” Chief Justice John Roberts implied that it was unfair to ask Alabama to “hit a sweet spot” between too little racial gerrymandering and too much. Where to draw the line? (Which is, of course, the question.)
Alabama, for its part, claims it is merely trying to comply with the Voting Rights Act, which has been interpreted to favour the creation of majority-minority districts wherever possible. As recently as last year, however, Alabama Republicans were challenging one part of the Voting Rights Act, in Shelby County v Holder15. (They succeeded.)
Today, no one doubts that Alabama Republicans' real aim is to draft an electoral map that favours their own party. That is, after all, what both parties invariably do when they get the chance. Justice Elena Kagan scoffed16: “Nobody would say that [the Voting Rights Act] required you to maintain a 78% [black] district.” Yet, as Justice Samuel Alito pointed17 out, gerrymandering based “purely on partisanship18 rather than on race” is perfectly19 legal. Whether it should be is another question.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 vows | |
誓言( vow的名词复数 ); 郑重宣布,许愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 margins | |
边( margin的名词复数 ); 利润; 页边空白; 差数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 gut | |
n.[pl.]胆量;内脏;adj.本能的;vt.取出内脏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 specifies | |
v.指定( specify的第三人称单数 );详述;提出…的条件;使具有特性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 subsidies | |
n.补贴,津贴,补助金( subsidy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 doom | |
n.厄运,劫数;v.注定,命定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coverage | |
n.报导,保险范围,保险额,范围,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 tricky | |
adj.狡猾的,奸诈的;(工作等)棘手的,微妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 caucus | |
n.秘密会议;干部会议;v.(参加)干部开会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 solidifying | |
(使)成为固体,(使)变硬,(使)变得坚固( solidify的现在分词 ); 使团结一致; 充实,巩固; 具体化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 holder | |
n.持有者,占有者;(台,架等)支持物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 scoffed | |
嘲笑,嘲弄( scoff的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 Partisanship | |
n. 党派性, 党派偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|