-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Congress and the president
Face-off
Anyone hoping for an outbreak of good government is likely to be disappointed
SPEAKING at the White House after a stinging mid-term defeat, Barack Obama adopted a conciliatory tone. “Both parties,” he said, “are going to have to come together and compromise to get something done here.” Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, agreed, adding that he hoped the president would work with Republicans on spending, energy and trade agreements. “The question,” said Senator McConnell, “is how do we meet in the middle?” That was in November 2010. There followed a government shutdown, two flirtations with a sovereign default over the raising of the legal limit on government borrowing, and the least productive Congress since anyone began counting.
The president and Mr McConnell once again made similar pronouncements about working together after another disastrous2 mid-term election for the Democrats3 on November 4th. Those who believe that this time will be different argue that divided government works better when Congress is wholly controlled by one party and the presidency4 by the other. When the House and the Senate are in the hands of different parties, according to this line of thinking, it is too easy for one to blame the other for intransigence5 and avoid governing.
Before this idea is tested by the new Congress in January, there is a lame-duck session to finish. These sessions of Congress are typically productive when compared with the healthy-duck sort. Because the budget process pushes controversial decisions towards the end of the year, a disproportionate number of important votes on spending will fall in a session where 12 senators (or 13, if Mary Landrieu loses a run-off in Louisiana on December 6th) will not have to face the voters again and can therefore smooth their passage. In 2010 the expiring Senate allowed gay people to serve openly in the military, ratified7 a treaty on nuclear missiles with Russia and extended some tax cuts.
Funding the government past December 11th, the deadline to avoid another shutdown, should be straightforward8. The confirmation9 of the 35 ambassadors and 16 judicial10 nominees12 currently before the Senate will be harder. In 2008 Democrats held a series of pretend sessions to prevent George W. Bush from making appointments while the chamber13 was in recess14. Republicans may now try a similar wheeze15; the Senate cannot go into recess without the agreement of the Republican-controlled House. Such shifty manoeuvres are now all too common.
Congress may give the president fast-track authority to negotiate foreign-trade deals. And there are other areas where Mr Obama and Republican leaders agree. Both sides want to lower America's high taxes on companies, which contribute to the parking of just over $2 trillion of profits overseas. Agreement may not lead anywhere: a sensible corporate-tax reform would lower rates and close loopholes; if done properly, it would mean a tax increase for those firms that now benefit from exemptions16. Since most Republican members of the House have signed a pledge to voters never to raise taxes, this will be a hard sell.
A more straightforward, though less important, change is likely when the new Senate takes up the Hire More Heroes bill, which the House has already passed and will revive in January. This would allow companies to hire veterans whose health care is covered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, without them counting towards the overall headcount for the purposes of the Affordable18 Care Act. Under that law, all firms with 50 or more full-time19 staff must provide them with health cover.
The way this bill works with Obamacare suggests that House Republicans know the law itself is not going away. (A bill to repeal20 it may find its way to the president's desk, but he would veto it.) A second likely tweak will be to repeal Obamacare's 2.3% tax on medical devices, which will slightly increase the deficit21 but not affect the way the health law works. Republicans will also try to change the definition of full-time work, which triggers an employer's obligation to provide insurance, from 30 hours a week to something lengthier22.
Mr McConnell may attach things that the president would rather avoid to proposals with broad support. Approval of the Keystone XL pipeline23, which would carry crude oil from Canada's tar6 sands to refineries24 on the Gulf25 coast, fits this description. But no compromise seems likely over global warming. The president wants to do something about it, as his tentative deal with China this week shows (see article). Most Republicans do not; Mr McConnell campaigned partly on rescuing his state's coal mines from federal bullying26.
Where are the new faces?
The new Senate will have to vet17 the president's appointments. The most pressing of these is a new attorney-general. The president has nominated Loretta Lynch, a federal prosecutor27, to take over from Eric Holder28. Ms Lynch, who has a Harvard law degree, is well qualified29 for the job. She also has a remarkable30 family story: her great-great-grandfather, a free black, fell in love with a slave and, unable to buy her freedom, became enslaved again so he could marry her. Ms Lynch's grandfather, a pastor31, helped blacks escape from the organised racism32 of Jim Crow states. These qualifications should see her confirmed, but her nomination33 hearing is likely to get caught up in a fight over immigration. The president has repeated a threat to use his executive power to slow the deportation34 of illegal immigrants—though he has yet to reveal how exactly he will do this. Senators Ted1 Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah have promised to press his nominee11 on whether such a move would be legal.
After his party's drubbing in the mid-terms, Mr Obama might be expected to reshuffle his team. Yet he shows no sign of doing so. Several cabinet members are newish and unlikely to be turfed out yet. Since Rahm Emanuel left in 2010, no chief of staff has lasted much more than a year. The president will be in no rush to get rid of the current one, Denis McDonough. One adviser35 whose importance is likely to grow is John Podesta, who was Bill Clinton's chief of staff when Republicans controlled Congress in the 1990s. He helped the two sides work together productively, despite the impeachment36 battle.
Many in Washington were hoping that Valerie Jarrett, Mr Obama's closest confidant, might move. Her vast influence, vague job description and lack of policy expertise37 infuriate Democrats and Republicans alike; but she will probably stay put. The president trusts her, and the mid-terms have made his job lonelier than ever.
1 ted | |
vt.翻晒,撒,撒开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 disastrous | |
adj.灾难性的,造成灾害的;极坏的,很糟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 intransigence | |
n.妥协的态度;强硬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 tar | |
n.柏油,焦油;vt.涂或浇柏油/焦油于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ratified | |
v.批准,签认(合约等)( ratify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 straightforward | |
adj.正直的,坦率的;易懂的,简单的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 recess | |
n.短期休息,壁凹(墙上装架子,柜子等凹处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 wheeze | |
n.喘息声,气喘声;v.喘息着说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 exemptions | |
n.(义务等的)免除( exemption的名词复数 );免(税);(收入中的)免税额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 vet | |
n.兽医,退役军人;vt.检查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 full-time | |
adj.满工作日的或工作周的,全时间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 lengthier | |
adj.长的,漫长的,啰嗦的( lengthy的比较级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 pipeline | |
n.管道,管线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 refineries | |
精炼厂( refinery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 bullying | |
v.恐吓,威逼( bully的现在分词 );豪;跋扈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 prosecutor | |
n.起诉人;检察官,公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 holder | |
n.持有者,占有者;(台,架等)支持物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 qualified | |
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 pastor | |
n.牧师,牧人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 racism | |
n.民族主义;种族歧视(意识) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 deportation | |
n.驱逐,放逐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 expertise | |
n.专门知识(或技能等),专长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|