-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Voice 1
Hello. Thank you for joining us for today’s Spotlight1 program. I’m Liz Waid.
Voice 2
And I’m Mike Procter. Spotlight uses a special English method of broadcasting. It is easier for people to understand, no matter where in the world they live.
Voice 1
In November, 2004, Spanish and English football teams competed in a friendly in Madrid, Spain. The English team included a few black men. At one point during the game, some Spanish team supporters began to make noises toward the black players. They made noises like monkeys. Monkeys are animals that look a little bit like people. The crowd chanted and shouted other racist2 insults at the English team. The Football Association and International Football governing groups investigated the incident. Leaders in both countries spoke3 against the actions of the supporters.
Voice 2
It is sad that this kind of behaviour happens often. These kinds of incidents are common. Groups of people chant insults about a player’s race, religion, country, or who they are. And it has a bigger effect than many people understand.
Voice 1
Chanting, repeating shouted words, is often very popular at many kinds of sports games. A large group of people shouts messages together. These messages can encourage the players. Crowds shout ‘go team go!’ or other encouraging things. Some teams even have special chants that supporters all know. These chants help to build excitement in a crowd. But, as you have probably experienced, crowds can also chant terrible things.
Voice 2
Football is a popular sport all around the world. Every year, millions of people come together to watch football games. Many people know every rule of the game. Many have a favourite team, or even a favourite team member. They want to support their favourite team or player with chants.
Voice 1
Many times, the people and feeling of a game can become very tense. A small group of people may begin chanting. People around them join the chant. But what happens when these chants are racist? Even people who do not agree with racist ideas may join the chanting. It is easy to get involved with a large crowd of people. A person may just want to ‘follow the crowd’ and be like everyone else.
Voice 2
But racist chanting can be harmful for players, supporters, and other people listening to or watching a sports game. It encourages bad opinions and bad behaviour. It influences younger people at the game. It influences opinions in the community.
Voice 1
Sports governing groups try to control bad things that happen between players. They may ban a player for saying racist things. They will not let him play anymore. They may even make the team pay an amount of money. Or they may ban a whole team from playing the sport.
Voice 2
But it is much harder to punish crowds of people - even when they are clearly doing bad things. Sports governing groups try to stop supporters who are chanting bad things. But often, they are not able to do much to stop or control the chanting. They may not even know where the chant started.
Voice 1
Racist chanting is a problem all over the world. So, some Dutch researchers are looking for ways to stop, or at least slow, abusive or racist chants. A new method uses sound to confuse people who are chanting abusive or racist words.
Voice 2
Sander van Wiingaarden is a Dutch researcher. He researches how sounds affect the human brain. He saw how racist chants affected4 Dutch football games. So, in 2004, Sander began working on a project to neutralize5 these racist chants. He wanted them to lose their power.
Voice 1
The system would record a crowd’s racist chanting. Then it would play the recording6 back to the crowd with a small delay.
Voice 2
Sander explains how his system works:
Voice 3
“We knew that people become confused if you feed their speech back with a delay. So we wanted to try and make it work in a group situation ... People chanting get information from several different places, but at the same time. They use these pieces of information to be able to chant in time with other people ... This can be very complex because there are large numbers of people involved.”
Voice 1
Sander and other researchers developed an early form of their system. A group of men volunteered to help them test it.
Researchers surrounded the men with loudspeakers. The loudspeakers played a recording of a crowd chanting at a sports game. Researchers told the men to join the chanting crowd. But one loudspeaker was different than all the others. The loudspeaker was also playing the recording of the chanting crowd. But, the recording was delayed by a short amount of time.
Voice 2
The researchers found that this was an effective way to confuse the men. The men could not follow the chant when one loudspeaker played a little behind the others. This method worked when the chanting was delayed by as little as two hundred [200] milliseconds. But it had the biggest effect when the chanting was delayed to one [1] second behind the other chanting.
Voice 1
Sander says that bringing the technology to real sports stadiums can be effective. But it may not be very simple. Loudspeakers at many stadiums are not complex or strong enough. Sander’s system also requires special microphone recording devices. Stadiums would need to put in new sound equipment.
Voice 2
And Sander has concerns about how crowds might react to the new device. He thinks that some crowds may begin racist chants on purpose just to see how the system works. This may mean that more racist chants happen at football games. Or, Sander explains, crowds might react very badly to the new system.
Voice 1
Many people become personally involved in sports. Sander says that people who become confused while chanting could also become very angry. Then, they could express their anger in very bad ways. Sander explains:
Voice 3
“If you make a crowd angry, by making it impossible to chant, you need to be very careful how you direct their anger. If they stop chanting but start rioting7 because they are angry, then you are worse off.”
Voice 2
But Sander will continue working on his idea. He knows that the problem of racist chanting is too big and too important to forget about. International Football Association President Sepp Blatter agrees. He says:
Voice 4
“There is no room whatsoever8 for racism9 or discrimination in our sport. Instead, football is a tool for building bridges and encouraging tolerance10.”
Voice 1
Every person can work to be more accepting and tolerant11 of other people. Think about what can you do to stop racist chanting at sports games you attend.
收听单词发音 |
1
spotlight
|
|
| n.公众注意的中心，聚光灯，探照灯，视听，注意，醒目 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
racist
|
|
| n.种族主义者，种族主义分子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
affected
|
|
| adj.不自然的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
neutralize
|
|
| v.使失效、抵消，使中和 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
recording
|
|
| n.录音，记录 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
rioting
|
|
| 暴乱，骚乱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
whatsoever
|
|
| adv.（用于否定句中以加强语气）任何；pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
racism
|
|
| n.民族主义；种族歧视(意识) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
tolerance
|
|
| n.宽容；容忍，忍受；耐药力；公差 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
tolerant
|
|
| adj.容忍的，有耐力的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索