-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
WASHINGTON—Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said a letter by 47 Republican senators sent directly to Iran's government "was out of step with the best traditions of American leadership" and undermined sensitive, international talks with the Islamic Republic to curb1 its nuclear program.
"Either these senators were trying to be helpful to the Iranians or harmful to the commander-in-chief in the midst of high-stakes international diplomacy," Clinton said in a news conference Tuesday at the United Nations. "Either answer does discredit2 to the letter's signatories."
Clinton had served in the Senate, representing New York State, from 2001 until becoming the nation's chief diplomat3 in 2009, appointed by President Barack Obama.
Her comments added to those of Vice4 President Joe Biden and other Democrats5 chastising7 the Republican senators.
US Congressional Letter to Iran Stirs Controversy8
They said an open letter to the leaders of Iran signed by the lawmakers could damage the diplomatic talks, adding that it is a move tantamount to rushing to war with Tehran.
The letter comes just weeks before a late-March deadline for the so-called P5+1 world powers to reach a deal with Iran. Besides the United States, they include China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom.
Biden, who was a senator for 36 years, said the letter threatens to undermine the ability of future presidents to negotiate international agreements and "is beneath the dignity of an institution I revere9."
"This letter sends a highly misleading signal to friend and foe10 alike that our commander-in-chief cannot deliver on America's commitments – a message that is as false as it is dangerous," Biden wrote in a statement late Monday.
He said the senators also offered "no viable11 alternative" to the ongoing12 nuclear negotiations13.
The Republicans' letter warned any nuclear agreement could be modified or revoked15 once Obama leaves office in early 2017.
A prominent political scientist said that while the letter is extraordinary and unusual, it is legitimate16 for the lawmakers to write it.
The letter, authored by freshman Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and co-signed by 46 other lawmakers, seeks to inform Iran’s leaders that any nuclear agreement involving the United States could face constitutional hurdles18.
It states that, while the president can negotiate international agreements, Congress plays "a significant role" in ratifying19 them. It says a so-called congressional-executive agreement requires a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, where a three-fifths majority of 100 senators is needed.
The letter also warned that any agreement regarding Iran’s nuclear weapons program that is not approved by the Congress will be viewed as nothing more than an executive agreement that could be revoked by a future president or modified by Congress.
Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammed Javad Zarif, denounced the letter Tuesday as having "no legal value" and dismissed it as "mostly a propaganda ploy20." He said "the conduct of inter-state relations is governed by international law and not by U.S. domestic law."
"This kind of communication is unprecedented21 and undiplomatic," Zarif was quoted as saying by a state-run TV website. "In fact, it implies that the United States is not trustworthy" if any nuclear deal could be scrapped22 once Obama leaves office.
Zarif warned future revocation23 of any agreement "would be a blatant24 violation25 of international law."
The letter seemed to harden partisan lines in the Senate, where Republicans will need Democrats' support to pass legislation now in the works to tighten27 sanctions on Iran or require congressional approval of a deal.
Senate Democratic Leader Harry28 Reid spoke29 out against the Republicans' "unprecedented" intervention30 in sensitive international negotiations "with the sole goal of embarrassing the president of the United States."
"This is a cynical31 effort by Republican senators to undermine sensitive international negotiations. It weakens America's hand and highlights our political divisions to the rest of the world," said Richard Durbin, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat6.
A spokeswoman for Cotton said his office had invited several Democrats to co-sign but none had done so.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's signature is on the letter; he said lawmakers should be suspicious of an administration that is intent on keeping Congress out of the emerging deal with Iran.
Several prospective32 presidential candidates also signed, including Republican Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. He said he would "sign the letter again tomorrow," calling it an extraordinarily33 important matter.
One Republican who did not sign was Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker. An aide said Corker is focused on getting a veto-proof majority to support his legislation, backed by both Republicans and Democrats, that would require Congress' authorization34 of an Iran deal.
Susan Collins of Maine also declined to sign. She told VOA that she didn't think the letter was appropriate and that she couldn't imagine the ayatollahs in Iran would care what Republican senators think.
Senate historian Don Ritchie told VOA it's highly unusual for lawmakers to write to a foreign leader disagreeing with the president.
Asked about the letter Monday, Obama said the U.S. lawmakers have aligned36 themselves with those in Iran opposed to the negotiations.
"I think it’s somewhat ironic37 to see some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran. It’s an unusual coalition," the president said. "I think what we’re going to focus on now is actually seeing whether we can get a deal or not and, if we do, then we will be able to make the case to the American people, and I’m confident we’ll be able to implement38."
Sunday, Obama acknowledged that gaps in the negotiating positions remain before a self-imposed, month's-end deadline to reach a framework agreement. He warned he would walk away from the talks without proper transparency and verification that Iran is not pursuing a nuclear weapon.
'Partisan strategy'
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the letter represents "a partisan strategy to undermine the president’s ability to conduct foreign policy" and advance U.S. national security interests.
"We have heard Republicans now, for quite some time, including the principal author of this letter, make clear that their goal is to undermine these negotiations," Earnest said.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said that the letter is designed "to score political points” and that Congress doesn’t have the power to alter the terms of international arrangements negotiated by the executive. She said any agreement reached would not be a treaty requiring Senate ratification39.
Also, this is "a negotiation14. It’s important for us to send this message to our partners around the world that it is with not just the United States and Iran, but with France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the European Union, China and Russia," Psaki said.
Unusual, not out of bounds
Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia, said the letter by U.S. lawmakers to a foreign government is both extraordinary and unusual, and represents an escalation40 of the political battle started last November when Republicans took control of both houses of Congress following elections.
"They can’t pass much because they don’t control Congress. They don’t have sufficient numbers in either the House or the Senate to be able to overcome their factionalism or the Senate rules," Sabato said. "But, what they do have is the ability to send a letter like this and affect negotiations on a major treaty or executive agreement."
He said the letter can be criticized on the basis of judgment41, but it is not outside the boundaries of the Constitution.
"In fact, because the legislature is a co-equal branch of government, it is completely legitimate for them to do this. Whether it is wise is another question," Sabato said.
He added that if any agreement reached with Iran is not submitted to the Senate as a treaty, it will be treated as an executive agreement, which can be revoked by a succeeding president. He added he has no doubt Iran's leaders are making that part of their calculus42.
Sabato said that if Obama wishes any nuclear agreement with Tehran to last, he would have to submit it to the Senate for ratification.
点击收听单词发音
1 curb | |
n.场外证券市场,场外交易;vt.制止,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 discredit | |
vt.使不可置信;n.丧失信义;不信,怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 chastising | |
v.严惩(某人)(尤指责打)( chastise的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 revere | |
vt.尊崇,崇敬,敬畏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 foe | |
n.敌人,仇敌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 viable | |
adj.可行的,切实可行的,能活下去的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 negotiation | |
n.谈判,协商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 revoked | |
adj.[法]取消的v.撤销,取消,废除( revoke的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 freshman | |
n.大学一年级学生(可兼指男女) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 hurdles | |
n.障碍( hurdle的名词复数 );跳栏;(供人或马跳跃的)栏架;跨栏赛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 ratifying | |
v.批准,签认(合约等)( ratify的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 ploy | |
n.花招,手段 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 scrapped | |
废弃(scrap的过去式与过去分词); 打架 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 revocation | |
n.废止,撤回 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 blatant | |
adj.厚颜无耻的;显眼的;炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 violation | |
n.违反(行为),违背(行为),侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 tighten | |
v.(使)变紧;(使)绷紧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 prospective | |
adj.预期的,未来的,前瞻性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 extraordinarily | |
adv.格外地;极端地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 aligns | |
使成一线( align的第三人称单数 ); 排整齐; 校准; 公开支持(某人、集体或观点) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 aligned | |
adj.对齐的,均衡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 ironic | |
adj.讽刺的,有讽刺意味的,出乎意料的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 implement | |
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 ratification | |
n.批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 calculus | |
n.微积分;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|