-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
With Title 42 set to end, questions loom1 about the future of migrants and asylum2
Just across the border from South Texas, hundreds of migrants are living in small, makeshift camps scattered4 around Reynosa, Mexico.
Many are hoping to apply for asylum in the U.S. but they're blocked, for now, by the pandemic border restrictions5 known as Title 42, which allows immigration authorities to quickly expel many migrants without allowing them to apply for asylum while in the U.S.
There's a lot of confusion in the camp about Title 42 and whether it's really ending or not on Dec. 21, as ordered by a federal judge.
"People know it ain't going to be easy for us," says Nicodemus Pierre-Louis, who is originally from Haiti. "We don't really know. We're just waiting to see what's going to happen."
Another Haitian, who identifies himself only by his first name, Kendis, says he's eager to cross the border as soon as Title 42 is lifted.
"I need asylum," he says in Spanish. "If I'm allowed to apply for asylum, I'm going. No problem."
There's some confusion on this side of the border, too. The federal judge who ordered the policy to come to a close ruled that the Title 42 is unlawful. The ruling was hailed as a victory by immigrant advocates, who have long argued that Title 42 was intended to block access to asylum protections under the pretense6 of protecting public health during the worst parts of the pandemic.
The Biden administration said this week that it will appeal that ruling, but will not seek to keep Title 42 in place while the case plays out. The appeal, instead, is about preserving the legal authority of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the agency that originally instituted the policy, says an administration official who asked not to be named because they were not authorized7 to speak for this story.
With the restrictions set to lift in less than two weeks, federal and local officials are bracing8 for an influx9 of migrants who've been waiting in border communities from Reynosa to Tijuana. That looming10 deadline has also prompted Congress and the White House to float proposals to extend Title 42, or limit access to asylum in other ways. And immigrant advocates say they worry that the right to seek asylum is still in jeopardy11.
Comparisons to Trump12's asylum policies
In particular, advocates are concerned that the Biden administration is considering an asylum policy similar to one originally devised by the administration of former President Donald Trump, as reported by Axios and other outlets13.
That was known as the transit14 ban. It would have denied asylum to migrants if they had already passed through other countries on the way to the U.S. without first seeking protection in those countries. It was eventually blocked in court.
"It's deeply disappointing that they could even be considering this policy," says Robyn Barnard, a lawyer with the non-profit Human Rights First during a call with reporters this week. "If the administration makes the mistake of going down this path, we will fight tooth and nail against it, again."
The White House disputes that the policies under discussion now would work the same way as Trump's transit ban. The Biden administration prefers to compare the proposals under consideration to a new program for Venezuelans that was announced in October.
In that case, the administration created a legal pathway for up to 24,000 Venezuelans, but only those who apply from outside the U.S. qualify. At the same time, the administration began turning away Venezuelans under Title 42 if they crossed the border illegally.
Asylum system under strain
Immigration hardliners have been trying for years to limit who can apply for asylum. They argue that many migrants are abusing the U.S. system because they know they'll be able to live and work in the country for years while waiting for their claims to be heard in immigration court.
"If the asylum system is not fixed15, this won't end," said U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, a Republican from Ohio, during a congressional hearing earlier this month. "We've got a crisis. And if we don't fix this crisis at the border, we'll continue to see these same results."
That echoes the rhetoric16 of the Trump administration, which tried a broad range of policies to limit access to asylum.
The Biden administration has launched a new system aimed at deciding asylum claims more quickly, with asylum officers at the Department of Homeland Security hearing some cases initially17 instead of first sending them to overloaded18 immigration judges.
But that's still a relatively19 small pilot program, while the number of migrant apprehensions20 climbed to record levels last year, straining the resources of immigration authorities and border communities.
A possible extension of Title 42
U.S. Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, a (soon-to-be former) Democrat21 from Arizona, and Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, reportedly want to continue Title 42 restrictions temporarily as a part of a broader deal that would also dedicate more funds for border security and create a pathway to citizenship22 for young immigrants known as Dreamers.
Their proposal got a chilly23 reception from Senate Republicans, who want to see border apprehensions come down from their near-record highs before considering any reforms to the immigration system.
Meanwhile, immigrant advocates welcomed the idea of bipartisan negotiations24, but not the extension of Title 42.
"If we just keep trying to extend Title 42, we're only putting a Band-Aid on what is something that just needs far greater attention," says Angela Kelley, a former Biden administration advisor25 who's now with the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Many of the migrants coming to the border are fleeing failed states in Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Haiti, Kelley says. She wants to see the Biden administration open more legal pathways so that these migrants don't have to cross the border illegally, citing the new program for Venezuelans as an example.
"If you create legal pathways for people, people would much rather come with, you know, a visa than with a smuggler," Kelley says, "rather than just trying to build either metaphorical26 or actual walls to keep people out. That won't work."
1 loom | |
n.织布机,织机;v.隐现,(危险、忧虑等)迫近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 asylum | |
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 pretense | |
n.矫饰,做作,借口 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 bracing | |
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 influx | |
n.流入,注入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 looming | |
n.上现蜃景(光通过低层大气发生异常折射形成的一种海市蜃楼)v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的现在分词 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 jeopardy | |
n.危险;危难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 outlets | |
n.出口( outlet的名词复数 );经销店;插座;廉价经销店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 transit | |
n.经过,运输;vt.穿越,旋转;vi.越过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 initially | |
adv.最初,开始 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 overloaded | |
a.超载的,超负荷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 apprehensions | |
疑惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 citizenship | |
n.市民权,公民权,国民的义务(身份) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 chilly | |
adj.凉快的,寒冷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 advisor | |
n.顾问,指导老师,劝告者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 metaphorical | |
a.隐喻的,比喻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|