-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Manhattan DA Bragg sues Rep. Jordan over attempts to interfere1 in Trump2 case
NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Adam Klasfeld, managing editor of Law & Crime, about Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's efforts to stop a Republican investigation4 into his prosecution5 of former President Trump.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has filed suit against Republican House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan. The New York DA accuses Jordan of interfering6 in the state prosecution of former President Donald Trump. Jordan has been raising questions about the grand jury investigation of Trump, and he's demanded confidential7 documents and testimony8 from Bragg, as well as from current and former employees of the DA's office. Adam Klasfeld is managing editor of Law & Crime and he joins us now via Skype. Good morning, Adam.
ADAM KLASFELD: Good morning.
FADEL: So not that there's anything usual about this case, but how extraordinary is this move by the district attorney to sue a representative in the House?
KLASFELD: Well, it's definitely an extraordinary lawsuit9, and the actions that preceded it and the case - it's all very extraordinary. Congressional committees have pretty broad discretion10 about what they can investigate. But what the lawsuit basically says is that it's not absolute. And interestingly enough, there - a lot of the outer boundaries of this were defined in another investigation of former President Trump. This was by Congress and it was Trump v. Mazars. And you can see throughout the lawsuit and the filings, they're invoking11 that precedent12, saying, hey, it doesn't live up to the test that the Supreme13 Court established in that case.
FADEL: Now, the lawsuit calls Jordan's behavior a brazen14 and unconstitutional attack, a transparent15 campaign to intimidate16 and attack the district attorney. If you could just talk about what the lawsuit is aiming to do here.
KLASFELD: The lawsuit is, first and foremost, trying to quash a subpoena17 into former - the former deputy of DA Alvin Bragg, Mark Pomerantz. Basically, the subpoena said that Mr. Pomerantz had written a book about his tenure18 with the district attorney's office, had done a media tour of it, and therefore doesn't really have the same privileges to protect things that he's written about, that he's gone on TV to speak about. And what the DA is arguing is that the privileges belong to the office. They don't belong to him. So on a core level, they're trying to basically declare that subpoena invalid19 and prospectively20 get the judge to declare any future subpoenas21 that Jordan's committee or any other congressional committee might send to his office is invalid and trampling22 upon the 10th Amendment23 and the separation of powers.
FADEL: Now, what Jordan is trying to do with this subpoena, is there a basis for what he's doing and for his questions?
KLASFELD: Now, one of the things that the congressman24 has said - he said, well, we're looking into federal funding. This is - the DA's office has accepted federal funding into it. Well, we've looked into it. And basically, Jordan had claimed that the DA's office admitted to it. Well, they said the opposite twice. They said that federal funding - none of the federal funding actually went into the investigation and the indictment25 of former President Trump. So the basis will be determined26 by the judge, and it might go to that test that we were talking about earlier, established by the Supreme Court, Trump v. Mazars.
FADEL: What has Representative Jordan said about the lawsuit?
KLASFELD: He has basically said that Congress has the right to do this. He said that - talking about Pomerantz, that he has gone out and written this book. We have the right to scrutinize27 it. And this lawsuit essentially28 throws down the gauntlet to challenge those assertions.
FADEL: Adam Klasfeld, managing editor of Law & Crime. Thanks for being here, Adam.
KLASFELD: Thank you for having me.
1 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 interfering | |
adj. 妨碍的 动词interfere的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 confidential | |
adj.秘(机)密的,表示信任的,担任机密工作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 invoking | |
v.援引( invoke的现在分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 brazen | |
adj.厚脸皮的,无耻的,坚硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 intimidate | |
vt.恐吓,威胁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 tenure | |
n.终身职位;任期;(土地)保有权,保有期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 invalid | |
n.病人,伤残人;adj.有病的,伤残的;无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 prospectively | |
adv.预期; 前瞻性; 潜在; 可能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 subpoenas | |
n.(传唤出庭的)传票( subpoena的名词复数 )v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 trampling | |
踩( trample的现在分词 ); 践踏; 无视; 侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 indictment | |
n.起诉;诉状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 scrutinize | |
n.详细检查,细读 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|