-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Are You Ready for 3-D Everything?
If those monsters pissing off Sam Worthington this weekend have anything to say about it, we'd better prepare for Snooki, Scorsese, and those damn teenage vampires1 jumping straight out at a depraved American curiosity — and our wallets
Thrilled as I always am for a new Tyler Perry movie, Mr. Post-Post-Racial chose the wrong weekend to try and uncork another No. 1 opening at the box office. If only he'd expanded Why Did I Get Married Too? into the third dimension — that juggernaut we haven't been able to get enough of over the last month, and which on Friday thrusts Clash of the Titans in our faces. This time with more dragon!
Thing is, 3-D Tyler Perry isn't that far off. Hell, if Harold and Kumar now make the cut, 3-D everything isn't that far off. I wouldn't be entirely2 shocked — surprised maybe, but definitely not shocked — to hear that MTV was negotiating a Jersey3 Shore adaptation wherein a free pair of Oakleys sent you spiraling into some sort of bronzed Na'vi frontier. Nor to find ladies and geeks alike succumbing4 to aneurysms when someone gets the bright idea to convert Julia Roberts's Eat Pray Love to 3-D, adding a pseudo-sumptuous layer of texture5 to the story of a woman globe-trotting her way to middle age. Film snobs6 might shrug7 it all off ... until word comes that Werner Herzog has planned his next fringe-y drama in 3-D, because, well, why not?
Indeed, many of 3-D's critics and/or latecomers will attribute its surge to some Hollywood alchemy of novelty and greed. And they would be half-right. A more honest read would acknowledge the ways that 3-D reflects the increasingly complex sophistication of its audience. It's not just higher ticket prices that will have given us, by this Sunday, the unprecedented8 blockbuster trifecta of Alice in Wonderland, How to Train Your Dragon, and Titans. Instead, the slow march of culture is leaving behind 2-D the same way it did silent films, black-and-white, and Cinemascope: hungry for a visual ambition — or any ambition, for that matter — that overrides9 the outmoded past and counteracts10 the economic wasteland around us. Much as we did during the Great Depression, we have, perhaps without even knowing it, colluded with Hollywood to redefine what we talk about when we talk about movies.
If that's indeed the case, then we're well overdue11 to move that conversation out into the open. After all, Hollywood will still be Hollywood; I don't exactly want to be caught off-guard when New Line Cinema approves the besunglassed re-release of Valentine's Day in 2011. Don't snicker — at these prices (3-D ticket surcharges experienced a hike of up to 26 percent last weekend), it can and likely will happen to all genres12 at some point. Horror is the obvious move (the next installment13 of the Saw franchise14 will go 3-D in October), but what would keep romantic comedies from getting the same treatment? Even if it costs a studio $100,000 per minute to convert something like this summer's Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz pairing Knight15 & Day, the likely turnout would more than compensate16 over the first couple weekends. Not just because of the curiosity factor, either, but because it reinforces the comfort of knowing no one is above our new way of watching.
See, what's great about 3-D is that it reminds us how useless rules can be in a scenario17 where experimentation18 is the coin of the realm. And how flat-out irrelevant19 they become when progress comes whether we like it or not. But I think, under the circumstances — in which we feel alienated20 from our leaders, our bosses, our spouses21, even our drilling — we do want them. We need new rules, in fact, just as badly as we needed the iPod, Facebook, or, come the next few years, a Blu-ray player and a flat-screen that's not as flat as it used to be. Our trips to see visually affected22 belching23 dragons are symptomatic of knowing that when you have no choice, you might as well hope for the best. But in the cultural subconscious24, we also have a recent habit of rewarding Hollywood for its most adventurous25 behavior, be it Quentin Tarantino revising history in Inglourious Basterds or the apartheid action-allegory District 9. And the embrace of 3-D — whether by specific artistic26 choice (Avatar), obvious cash-grab (Titans), or both (Alice) — is about as adventurous as it gets. It's as though even the most cynical27 generation in American history can now identify with what it must have been like to experience the first talkie, or the F/X revolution of 2001: A Space Odyssey28. Maybe it should come as no surprise that the more conservative blockbuster kingpin Michael Bay isn't going to compromise his forthcoming masterwork Transformers 3 for any homogenized "fake 3-D." (Probably because he'll be too busy planning fake Rosemary's Baby.)
Nevertheless, even Bay's defiance29 says something about the 3-D future belonging to the artists. Even if studios were to insist (as Warner Brothers recently did) that all their major releases be produced in 3-D, the format30 entitles filmmakers to a certain freedom that they might not have had without it. Avatar aside, there really is no road map or rulebook for what can or can't, should or shouldn't be attempted in the medium. This manifests itself in various ways, from explorations of the physics of falling food in Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs to Steven Soderbergh planning a 3-D musical version of Cleopatra (seriously). It cracks open a kind of challenge: Hey, Marty Scorsese, can you get better again with this stuff? Hey, P.T. Anderson and Coen kids, the screen still too small for you? We've already established that Tyler Perry's films routinely open to huge crowds, but if he was really savvy31 about the moment we're in, he'd get Madea Goes to 3-D underway one helluva lot faster than For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf. Not just for the money (though that, too), but because more than half his stories develop from hit plays anyway, and it would be kinda fascinating to see him adapt and preserve what he could of that format with the 3-D effect.
For now, though, Perry will be content as the spoiler at this week's 3-D party — a role you'll see diminish as more technology sweeps our multiplexes and 2-D goes the way of 8-millimeter home movies. It could take years, but not if Hollywood has anything to do with it: Based on how well the Titans conversion32 performs, expect studios to seriously consider bolstering33 this year's 3-D crop (already including Tron Legacy34, Shrek Forever After, Toy Story 3D, Harry35 Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Piranha 3D and, of course, Jackass 3D) with closer looks at converting cash magnets like The Twilight36 Saga37: Eclipse, The Sorcerer's Apprentice38, or even the camp-classic-to-be Burlesque39 — assuming, of course, that audiences can handle both Christina Aguilera and Cher in 3-D all in one place. But, hey, there's only one way to find out.
点击收听单词发音
1 vampires | |
n.吸血鬼( vampire的名词复数 );吸血蝠;高利贷者;(舞台上的)活板门 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 jersey | |
n.运动衫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 succumbing | |
不再抵抗(诱惑、疾病、攻击等)( succumb的现在分词 ); 屈从; 被压垮; 死 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 texture | |
n.(织物)质地;(材料)构造;结构;肌理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 snobs | |
(谄上傲下的)势利小人( snob的名词复数 ); 自高自大者,自命不凡者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 shrug | |
v.耸肩(表示怀疑、冷漠、不知等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 overrides | |
越控( override的第三人称单数 ); (以权力)否决; 优先于; 比…更重要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 counteracts | |
对抗,抵消( counteract的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 overdue | |
adj.过期的,到期未付的;早该有的,迟到的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 genres | |
(文学、艺术等的)类型,体裁,风格( genre的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 installment | |
n.(instalment)分期付款;(连载的)一期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 franchise | |
n.特许,特权,专营权,特许权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 knight | |
n.骑士,武士;爵士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 compensate | |
vt.补偿,赔偿;酬报 vi.弥补;补偿;抵消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 experimentation | |
n.实验,试验,实验法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 irrelevant | |
adj.不恰当的,无关系的,不相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 alienated | |
adj.感到孤独的,不合群的v.使疏远( alienate的过去式和过去分词 );使不友好;转让;让渡(财产等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 spouses | |
n.配偶,夫或妻( spouse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 belching | |
n. 喷出,打嗝 动词belch的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 subconscious | |
n./adj.潜意识(的),下意识(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 adventurous | |
adj.爱冒险的;惊心动魄的,惊险的,刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 odyssey | |
n.长途冒险旅行;一连串的冒险 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 defiance | |
n.挑战,挑衅,蔑视,违抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 format | |
n.设计,版式;[计算机]格式,DOS命令:格式化(磁盘),用于空盘或使用过的磁盘建立新空盘来存储数据;v.使格式化,设计,安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 savvy | |
v.知道,了解;n.理解能力,机智,悟性;adj.有见识的,懂实际知识的,通情达理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 conversion | |
n.转化,转换,转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 bolstering | |
v.支持( bolster的现在分词 );支撑;给予必要的支持;援助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 twilight | |
n.暮光,黄昏;暮年,晚期,衰落时期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 saga | |
n.(尤指中世纪北欧海盗的)故事,英雄传奇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 apprentice | |
n.学徒,徒弟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 burlesque | |
v.嘲弄,戏仿;n.嘲弄,取笑,滑稽模仿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|