-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ALISON STEWART, PBS NEWSHOUR WEEKEND ANCHOR: To discuss the security situation in Europe, I am joined from Warsaw by Paul Jones, the American ambassador to Poland. He's a career foreign service officer appointed by President Obama in 2015 and is staying on with the Trump1 administration.
Ambassador, what is your reaction to the Kremlin calling Operation Atlantic Resolve a provocation2 and, quote, "a threat"?
PAUL JONES, U.S. AMBASSADOR TO POLAND: Well, Alison, you know, these decisions have been taken over a course of time, and especially after Russian's invasion of Ukraine and its occupation of Ukrainian territory, which led to a deterioration3 of the security environment here, and a lot of anxiety from some of our allies.
And so, our military together with our allied4 militaries took some prudent5, took — made some prudent recommendations to political leadership. And that includes this deployment6 of a U.S. armored brigade combat team first to Poland and then to the region.
STEWART: Ambassador, why commit troops specifically to Poland?
JONES: Well, Poland is really the hub of this deployment. So, these forces, about 3,500, 4,000 soldiers with heavy armor will — are deploying7 from Poland because of Poland's geographic8 location. And they will be headquartered here in Poland. But they will also be in the Baltic States. They'll be in Hungary, they'll be in Romania and Bulgaria. All of those countries have requested this support.
东欧国家支持北约限制俄罗斯
JONES: You know, this is a bilateral10 deployment, this particular deployment that is happening right now. Later in the spring, we will have the NATO contingents11 come in, a U.S. battalion12 will come to Poland, British, German and Canadian battalions13 will go to the Baltic countries, but this is really supported by all 28 allies one way or the other. And even within this region, Poland, for example, is contributing to the security of other countries along this side of NATO because it's the largest country and the one with the most capable military itself.
STEWART: We have a new president in the United States, one who has questioned the United States role within NATO. Is there any concern there that the U.S. troops will be asked to come home — to return home by the Trump administration?
JONES: Well, I think the government and the president of Poland are looking forward to having a detailed14 — there's been some contact already. But they're looking forward to having a detailed conversation about the security in this region and about how the United States and Poland — I mean, Poland sees the United States as its, you know, primary strategic ally. But the whole alliance can ensure security in this region.
STEWART: One of Mr. Trump's criticisms of NATO is that all the member nations are supposed to devote 2 percent to their GDP to defense15. Only five nations do that. The United States and Poland being two of the five.
Is it — is there anything that you and other diplomats16 can do to create more equity17 in that situation? And does it ever cause tensions between the member nations?
JONES: You know, as you say, Poland is contributing its 2 percent and actually is involved in a broader military modernization18 program, which includes very significant purchases of military equipment, and weaponry from the United States as part of that. So — but I think you see over all, a growing sense within the alliance that we have to pick up the pace of every ally reaching that 2 percent and every ally contributing.
And we see that, really, in what's happening in this part of the alliance. And as I say, Poland is a big contributor to that and frankly19, you know, wants to be part of not only the contributions militarily but the policy discussion going forward in — you know, with the new administration in Washington and also in the future meetings of the alliance.
STEWART: Ambassador Paul Jones from Warsaw, Poland — thank you for being with us.
JONES: Thank you. It's been a pleasure, Alison.
点击收听单词发音
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 provocation | |
n.激怒,刺激,挑拨,挑衅的事物,激怒的原因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 deterioration | |
n.退化;恶化;变坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 deployment | |
n. 部署,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 deploying | |
(尤指军事行动)使展开( deploy的现在分词 ); 施展; 部署; 有效地利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 geographic | |
adj.地理学的,地理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deterrent | |
n.阻碍物,制止物;adj.威慑的,遏制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 bilateral | |
adj.双方的,两边的,两侧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 contingents | |
(志趣相投、尤指来自同一地方的)一组与会者( contingent的名词复数 ); 代表团; (军队的)分遣队; 小分队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 battalion | |
n.营;部队;大队(的人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 battalions | |
n.(陆军的)一营(大约有一千兵士)( battalion的名词复数 );协同作战的部队;军队;(组织在一起工作的)队伍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 diplomats | |
n.外交官( diplomat的名词复数 );有手腕的人,善于交际的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 equity | |
n.公正,公平,(无固定利息的)股票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 modernization | |
n.现代化,现代化的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|