-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
GWEN IFILL: Brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder1 are two well-known signature wounds of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But there is another injury, lung disease, that afflicts2 tens of thousands of veterans. Many blame a single defense3 contractor4 and have filed a class action lawsuit5, a case that has now made its way to the Supreme6 Court.
NewsHour producer Dan Sagalyn has been covering this, and Hari Sreenivasan has the story.
MAN: We have a burn pit down here.
HARI SREENIVASAN: This shaky video of smoke from burning garbage was shot by an American soldier in Iraq in 2008. Throughout most of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the military used so-called burn pits to dispose of virtually all waste.
MAN: That is what we leave next to. Luckily, the wind is not blowing our way today.
HARI SREENIVASAN: All kinds of things went up in smoke, from batteries, paint, solvents7 and tires, to newspapers, plastic water bottles, styrofoam, electronic equipment, and shipping8 materials such as plastic wrap. Even whole vehicles were burned.
At large bases, 30 to 40 of tons garbage were burned every day. At the gigantic logistical hubs, three to five times that amount was burned. Sometimes, jet fuel was even used to ignite the trash. According to the veterans we spoke9 to, the smoke from the burn pits permeated10 the living quarters and work spaces on base.
SGT. 1ST CLASS STEVEN GARDNER, (RET), U.S. Army: There was really no place to escape. The smoke would blow across you, you would turn your back to it, and hope that the wind would change.
LT. COL. RICK LAMBERTH, (RET.), U.S. Army: You have to breath, or you die. And, sometimes, even the soot11 would fly out of the burn pits and get on your uniform or on your vehicle.
LT. COL. BRIAN BOWER12 (RET.), U.S. Marine13 Corps14: At night, when the winds dropped, that's when you didn't want to the burn pits to be operating because it would blanket the base.
HARI SREENIVASAN: These three officers, Army Sergeant15 1st Class Steven Gardner, Army Lieutenant16 Colonel Rick Lamberth, and Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel Brian Bower, were medically retired17 from the military. They say the burn pit smoke was toxic18 and made them sick.
SGT. 1ST CLASS STEVEN GARDNER: I used to run five-minute miles. Now I can't walk down the block without breathing real heavy. I can't carry objects without getting out of breath. I have a tightness constantly in my chest.
LT. COL. RICK LAMBERTH: I no longer can hold out to run. I don't have the stamina19. At one time, I could go run five or 6.6 miles at a time, a 10k at a time.
A lot of times even during the day, I cough and people look at me like I'm a smoker20. Sometimes it's embarrassing.
LT. COL. BRIAN BOWER: I believe that I have lung cancer as a result of exposure to the burn pits. I'm not a smoker. I was diagnosed within a year after leaving active duty. And the diagnosis21 came from the Veterans Administration. It was diagnosed as exposure to burn pits, and I had part of my lung removed.
HARI SREENIVASAN: These men are part of a class action lawsuit which has 250 named plaintiffs. But they represent a group of potentially up to 100,000 veterans and civilian22 contractors23 who could join suit.
They're suing Kellogg Brown & Root, or KBR, the company that used to be a subsidiary of Halliburton and was contracted to provide logistical support to the military in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was KBR's job to truck in supplies, feed troops, and get rid of the garbage.
SUSAN BURKE, Lead Attorney: We have outlawed24 burning of waste in this country for decades. You cannot go in your backyard and burn all your trash in a bucket. And the reason why is that it's known to be harmful to human health.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Susan Burke is the lead attorney for the class action lawsuit. She says KBR was negligent25 and made the service members sick.
SUSAN BURKE: One of the things that they promised to do was to take care of the waste, to dispose of the waste in a manner that wasn't harmful to the troops. They didn't do that. So, the complaint alleges26 that that open air burning, which violated the terms of the contract, caused these injuries.
ROBERT MATTHEWS, Attorney, KBR: That's completely false. We exactly lived up to our contractual promise.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Robert Matthews is the lead counsel for KBR. He points to a letter from the commander of coalition27 forces in Iraq, General David Petraeus, to Congress written in 2008.
The letter says — quote — "There is and will continue to be a need for burn pits during contingency28 operations."
The Government Accountability Office issued a report confirming that the top military commanders approved the use of these open air fires.
ROBERT MATTHEWS: The decisions to use burn pits were made by senior military rank across these war theaters.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Matthews says other alternatives were not feasible. Burying the refuse off base was too risky29. Burying it on base, well, there wasn't enough space. There was no recycling in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it was up to the military to decide if it wanted to bring in incinerators which burn cleanly. He says historically the Army always burned its garbage in war zones because it's the least bad option.
ROBERT MATTHEWS: More than 50 percent of the burn pits that are in play around Iraq and Afghanistan through that 10-year period were operated by the military itself, not by KBR or other contractors.
HARI SREENIVASAN: The class action lawsuit has been in the courts since 2008. Just earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the case should go forward. But KBR has asked the Supreme Court to intervene. The company asserts that, just like the government, it should be immune from lawsuits30.
ROBERT MATTHEWS: Where the United States is at war on a battlefield engaged in combatant activities, the companies like KBR who are embedded31 with the forces, who are performing mission-critical services shouldn't be subject to the kind of claims that have been made here. If the United States is immune from such claims, so too should KBR and those other contractor companies.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Susan Burke disagrees.
SUSAN BURKE: What they're trying to say is that simply because they work for the government, they are the government. We know that's not the case. This is a private company that's making a huge profit margin32. They are not the government and they don't deserve the government immunities33.
HARI SREENIVASAN: By 2010, the military eventually shipped in nearly 40 incinerators to Iraq and 20 to Afghanistan, although the veterans we spoke to said they often were not used.
MAN: We don't know if we're receiving fire, but that's exploding paint cans.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Besides these legal issues, there is debate over how much burn pits contributed to people's illnesses.
Craig Postlewaite is a top official in the Defense Department's Public Health Division. He says it's possible some soldiers got sick from inhaling34 burn pit smoke, but not likely that many were affected35.
CRAIG POSTLEWAITE, Department of Defense: It would be plausible36 for a specific individual maybe to acquire some kind of condition related to burn pit smoke depending on how close they were to the burn pit, how much smoke they breathed, individual susceptibilities and even exposure to other airborne particulates38. We feel that if there are people who have been harmed by burn pit emissions39, the numbers are fairly low.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Postlewaite points to many other pollutants40 in the air that could have caused veterans' respiratory problems.
CRAIG POSTLEWAITE: It's a very, very dusty environment. Plus, the urban pollutants aren't regulated well. The cars and trucks are not regulated, so there's a lot of airborne material in the air that could be contributory towards long-term health effects.
HARI SREENIVASAN: But Dr. Anthony Szema sees a direct connection between sick veterans and the burn pits. At Stony41 Brook42 School of Medicine in New York, where he does research, he's exposed mice to dust from military bases in Iraq that had burn pits.
DR. ANTHONY SZEMA, Stony Brook School of Medicine: And this healthy mouse, we then gave dust from Camp Victory Iraq collected in 2007 at the time they had burn pits, and the dust induces a lung injury.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Szema has a private practice and is also a doctor at Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, although the views he expresses here are his own.
DR. ANTHONY SZEMA: Humans exposed to particulate37 matter air pollution have a higher risk of death, premature43 death. They have higher risks of lung disease such as premature emphysema, chronic44 obstructive pulmonary disease, even in the absence of smoking, as well as asthma45. Benzene is a carcinogen, so if you burn your trash with jet fuel called JP-8, when you burn in a burn pit, it's burning at low heat. At low heat, it generates more particles and has products of incomplete combustion46.
These products are dangerous. In addition, if you burn plastic water bottles, among the chemicals you can release include a neurotoxin called n-Hexane.
HARI SREENIVASAN: While the lawyers and the health professionals debate the legal and medical issues, the veterans we spoke to compare their experiences to soldiers exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam. That's the defoliant the Army used which caused cancer, nerve damage and respiratory injury in hundreds of thousands of soldiers.
Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel Brian Bower:
LT. COL. BRIAN BOWER: Nobody went out to purposefully hurt, again, soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines. And so — but people are suffering from exposure to it afterwards. And the military response is very similar probably to Agent Orange, which was at first denial, assessment47, acceptance of culpability48, and treatment. We seem to be going through those same phases now.
HARI SREENIVASAN: The veterans we spoke to say while they wish they weren't sick, they'd still serve in Iraq and Afghanistan all over again.
SGT. 1ST CLASS STEVEN GARDNER: I'm proud of my military service. I'm proud of what the military has done over there. If I had known that this would be my outcome, I still would have continued and done exactly the same thing.
HARI SREENIVASAN: Meanwhile, KBR says if they and other battlefield defense contractors are allowed to be sued, it's unlikely they would deploy49 with the military in the next war.
ROBERT MATTHEWS: If they are exposed to these lawsuits for decades of litigation and potentially tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars in liabilities, then it's very likely that these companies are going to think twice about stepping forward the next time this country goes to war.
HARI SREENIVASAN: The Supreme Court is now in the process of deciding whether or not to hear this case or send it back to a lower court, where it can go to trial.
For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Hari Sreenivasan.
JUDY WOODRUFF: If you would like more on this story, go to our Web site for extended interviews and a slide show of burn pit photos submitted to us by those who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.
点击收听单词发音
1 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 afflicts | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 contractor | |
n.订约人,承包人,收缩肌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 solvents | |
溶解的,溶剂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 shipping | |
n.船运(发货,运输,乘船) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 permeated | |
弥漫( permeate的过去式和过去分词 ); 遍布; 渗入; 渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 soot | |
n.煤烟,烟尘;vt.熏以煤烟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 bower | |
n.凉亭,树荫下凉快之处;闺房;v.荫蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 marine | |
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 corps | |
n.(通信等兵种的)部队;(同类作的)一组 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 sergeant | |
n.警官,中士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 lieutenant | |
n.陆军中尉,海军上尉;代理官员,副职官员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 toxic | |
adj.有毒的,因中毒引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 stamina | |
n.体力;精力;耐力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 smoker | |
n.吸烟者,吸烟车厢,吸烟室 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 diagnosis | |
n.诊断,诊断结果,调查分析,判断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 outlawed | |
宣布…为不合法(outlaw的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 negligent | |
adj.疏忽的;玩忽的;粗心大意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 alleges | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 contingency | |
n.意外事件,可能性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 risky | |
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 lawsuits | |
n.诉讼( lawsuit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 embedded | |
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 margin | |
n.页边空白;差额;余地,余裕;边,边缘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 immunities | |
免除,豁免( immunity的名词复数 ); 免疫力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 inhaling | |
v.吸入( inhale的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 plausible | |
adj.似真实的,似乎有理的,似乎可信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 particulate | |
adj.微小的;n.微粒,粒子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 particulates | |
n.微粒,粒子( particulate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 pollutants | |
污染物质(尤指工业废物)( pollutant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 stony | |
adj.石头的,多石头的,冷酷的,无情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 brook | |
n.小河,溪;v.忍受,容让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 premature | |
adj.比预期时间早的;不成熟的,仓促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 chronic | |
adj.(疾病)长期未愈的,慢性的;极坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 asthma | |
n.气喘病,哮喘病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 combustion | |
n.燃烧;氧化;骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 assessment | |
n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 culpability | |
n.苛责,有罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|