-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Now we try to explore how President Trump1's firing of Comey has divided Republicans with Steve Deace.
He's a popular conservative radio talk show host in Iowa. And David Avella, he's chairman of GOPAC.
And welcome to both of you to the program. Thank you.
David Avella, I'm going to start with you. What's your assessment4 of the president's decision to fire James Comey and how he handled it?
The president didn't have a choice. There is a term in the military called combat ineffective.
And James Comey had become combat ineffective, that the — he had become a political punching bag.
And, gosh, for most Americans, it was causing whiplash. One day, Republicans were for him, and one day, they were against him.
One day, Democrats6 were for him, one day, Democrats were against him based off what he was saying in any given press account that he did.
about how FBI agents and the bureaucracy at the FBI didn't trust him any longer about the way he was handling the investigations9.
And so he had become ineffective inside the building, and he was a political punching bag outside the building. The president didn't have a choice.
He had to get rid of him. And let's keep in mind the FBI director serves at the will and pleasure of the president.
When you don't have the president's confidence anymore, you're gone.
Steve Deace, how do you see — what's your assessment of the president's move?
Well, I agree with David's analysis of why this had to be done.
It was hilarious10 watching John Podesta at 5:00 on Tuesday talk about what a terrible person — I'm sorry — at 11:00 on Tuesday talk about what a terrible person Comey was,
and then, at 5:00, suddenly, this was Watergate and Comey shouldn't be fired.
So, I agree with David's analysis of the hypocrisy11 here, but the execution and how this was done undermines the White House's own cause, Judy.
And even if you buy into what — to wild conspiracy12 theories, and even if you agree that most of the media is liberal
and I do — and would like the see Trump fail, he can't play into that. And he does this systematically13.
You can't have Sarah Huckabee on day two of her tryout essentially14 to replace Sean Spicer contradicting everything she said on day one.
You can't have the vice15 president seven times yesterday say that they got rid of Comey on a recommendation from the deputy A.G.,
and then have the president go off and do his own interview with Lester Holt where he said, I was going to get rid of him irregardless.
So I mean, they have to understand, even if they believe everyone is against them, that you have to understand the environment you are in, and you have to plan accordingly.
They often don't. And they often help to feed these narratives16 that work against them.
David Avella, what about Steve Deace's point that the way the White House has handled this is what is hurting them?
It may not be the way human resource manuals 101 suggest handling things.
But the best way a president can see how he's doing is based off midterm election.
And next year, voters are not going to the polls to cast their votes based on James Comey getting fired or not fired.
They're going to base their vote on, are there more jobs, have we been kept safe, the two reasons why President Trump was elected in the first place?
What about this Russia investigation8, though, David Avella?
Judy, I defy any member of the media or any Democrat5 to find 10 voters who were influenced and impacted by the alleged17 information about
from Russia that they received last year during the election, and the first nine can be liars18 and say they did.
You're not going to find 10 people who were influenced by what they heard last year about Hillary Clinton.
She was mid-40s in her approval rating in January before the election. That's where she was on Election Day. Voters' opinions of Hillary Clinton didn't change through the election.
Be that as it may, Steve Deace, what about the credibility of that investigation? How much does that matter to this president?
Well, I think the last election proved really that I don't know how much Trump's credibility really matters to most voters that would even consider voting for him,
especially last year, Judy, when the proxy19 for the other side was maybe the most dishonest politician of her era.
And for Trump, I think it comes down to this. Everything David said there is right.
But you get to a point where the lack of execution gets in the way of you actually delivering on your promises.
And right now, they're trying to ram3 through a health care fix that doesn't repeal20 Obamacare, that 26 percent of Americans like.
We're not sure what the tax reform proposal is going to look like. They have got to actually get to doing the things they promised the American people they would do.
If they do those things, then, as the people showed in the 1990s, when we went after Bill Clinton, if the economy is great,
I have got jobs, and my wages are doing well, then I really don't care what your character is.
But if things aren't going well, then suddenly I care, and I care a lot. And this White House needs to actually start governing.
And, Judy, I will just give you one quick example before we went on the air, Trump trolling Rudy — or trolling Rosie on Twitter.
You know, that's funny when the economy is growing at 4 and 5 percent. It's petulant21 and immature22 when it's not.
They have got to govern, and just stop the consistent trolling and reality show and actually govern the country, Judy.
Talking about Rosie O'Donnell. David Avella, respond to what he said. And, also, I want to ask both of you, as we wrap this up,
what's going to determine whether the White House gets back on an even keel in the short-term or whether things just continue to — seem to be in turmoil23?
In this environment, it's hard to define what even keel will mean.
And there will always be — there's very strong feelings about this president on both sides.
But what are they going to judge his legacy24 on or his presidency25 on? Are we getting results? Are there going to be more jobs?
And, look, there is much discussion even amongst — and Steve mentioned it — even amongst conservatives, oh, we're not doing enough.
We're a few months into this administration. And there are plenty of examples, particularly at the state level, where GOPAC focuses,
where maybe a Republican governor and a legislature, when they first enact26 something, it starts out unpopular,
but then when people start seeing the actual positive results, those governors, those legislatures are reelected overwhelmingly.
And if President Trump delivers on the positive things that he talked about, more jobs saved for Americans, he's going to be reelected.
And you're saying it doesn't matter about the Comey — the Comey incident won't matter in the end.
Steve Deace, what's going to determine whether things stabilize27, seem to get back on track, or remain — I would use the same word — in turmoil?
Judy, when I used to do sports talk radio, what I would find is that if the team's quarterback ran afoul of the law,
but he had played well in his last game, most fans didn't care, but if he had played poorly in his last game,
suddenly, they wanted him disciplined and the program needs to stand for something bigger.
I think that also applies here. If he governs well, if they get results, then I think most people will say,
that's just Trump being Trump, and, frankly28, he — a lot of the same that people don't like him, I don't like either.
But if this is the substitute for governing, if this is what they do instead of getting results, if they have nothing else other than this reality show,
then I think, in November of 2018, you will see that rubber band snap back, and it will do so with extreme prejudice.
Steve Deace, talk show host joining us from Iowa, David Avella from GOPAC here in Washington, gentlemen, thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, Judy. undefined
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
trump
|
|
| n.王牌，法宝；v.打出王牌，吹喇叭 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
devoted
|
|
| adj.忠诚的，忠实的，热心的，献身于...的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
ram
|
|
| (random access memory)随机存取存储器 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
assessment
|
|
| n.评价；评估；对财产的估价，被估定的金额 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
democrat
|
|
| n.民主主义者，民主人士；民主党党员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
democrats
|
|
| n.民主主义者，民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
secondly
|
|
| adv.第二，其次 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
investigation
|
|
| n.调查，调查研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
investigations
|
|
| （正式的）调查( investigation的名词复数 )； 侦查； 科学研究； 学术研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
hilarious
|
|
| adj.充满笑声的，欢闹的；[反]depressed | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
hypocrisy
|
|
| n.伪善，虚伪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
conspiracy
|
|
| n.阴谋，密谋，共谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
systematically
|
|
| adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
essentially
|
|
| adv.本质上，实质上，基本上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
vice
|
|
| n.坏事；恶习；[pl.]台钳，老虎钳；adj.副的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
narratives
|
|
| 记叙文( narrative的名词复数 )； 故事； 叙述； 叙述部分 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
alleged
|
|
| a.被指控的，嫌疑的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
liars
|
|
| 说谎者( liar的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
proxy
|
|
| n.代理权，代表权；（对代理人的）委托书；代理人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
repeal
|
|
| n.废止，撤消；v.废止，撤消 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
petulant
|
|
| adj.性急的，暴躁的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
immature
|
|
| adj.未成熟的，发育未全的，未充分发展的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
turmoil
|
|
| n.骚乱，混乱，动乱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
legacy
|
|
| n.遗产，遗赠；先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
presidency
|
|
| n.总统(校长，总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
enact
|
|
| vt.制定(法律)；上演，扮演 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
stabilize
|
|
| vt.（使）稳定，使稳固，使稳定平衡；vi.稳定 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
frankly
|
|
| adv.坦白地，直率地；坦率地说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索