-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
This week, the Trump1 administration signed a $12 billion deal to sell the Persian Gulf2 nation of Qatar three dozen F-15 fighter jets made by Boeing.
The deal comes a week after President Trump labeled Qatar a funder of terrorism in the Middle East.
For that reason, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and other Arab nations have severed3 diplomatic ties with Qatar and imposed an economic boycott4.
Yet, Qatar has also been a key U.S. ally, with the largest U.S. military base in the region, hosting 10,000 troops.
For more, I'm joined from Washington by "Wall Street Journal" reporter Jay Solomon.
Jay, I'm a little confused by my own comments here. Are they, on the one hand, funder of terrorism at the highest levels, as the president said, or are we selling them fighter jets?
I mean, it's a very complicated situation for sure. You have the Al Udeid Airbase,
which is the main staging ground for U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.
You have huge Exxon business interests in Qatar. You've had a lot of counterterrorism cooperation.
But at the same time, there has been concern going back years that there is money coming from Qatar that has reached al Qaeda elements,
And even back to the Bush administration, a lot of concern that al Jazeera, its main source of soft power,
stirs up anti-American sentiment at times, or stirs up sentiment against Qatar's neighbors in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. So, it's very much a conflicted picture.
So, this week, it seems those conversations have moved to Washington, D.C., the sides are lobbying.
It's amazing. Every one of these governments — Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar — have flooded the zone, as some say, into Washington to meet Secretary Tillerson, Secretary Mattis, meet press.
And these countries have so much influence in Washington through investments and think tanks, through lobbying firms,
just through their business and defense7 contracts that it's — it's a very much a conflict that's playing out here, as much as it is in the Gulf.
And each side has real equities8 that they bring, and I think that's part of the reason you've seen such mixed messages from the Trump administration.
And I also think they're here because they don't really know exactly what the Trump position is
because he's said things that on the surface appear at odds9 with his secretary of state, and his defense secretary.
So, the secretary of state has tried to kind of calm the temperature down. But then the president says what he says.
Secretary Tillerson has been working the phones aggressively over the past week and meeting with foreign ministers from these countries,
basically saying this economic siege that is being pushed on Qatar should be eased.
And that there's a concern that counter-ISIS operations that are run out of Al Udeid can be — could be impacted if this feud10 doesn't end.
So, he's very much pushed that line backed by Secretary Tillerson.
The problem is, president Trump, on his tweets and in public comments, has seemed to side with Saudi Arabia and want UAE against Qatar saying,
you know, this high-level support of terrorism that has been allegedly seen.
Has this break in the Gulf alliance created an opportunity for Iran?
Because we are reporting that they were one of the first people that sent food aide to Qatar. What's happening with that?
No, I think definitely, because President Trump when he went to Saudi Arabia has basically been trying to create this bloc11 of Gulf Arab states against ISIS,
but also against Iran, and Iran's loving the fact that there's this feud. And a lot of these countries, whether it's Qatar, Bahrain, the UAE — I mean, they're pretty vulnerable to Iran.
And this hope of not just the Trump administration but the Obama administration, as well, that they could create a bloc against these six countries in that region against Iran,
these very visible fissures12 play to Iran's advantage, that they are playing a very astute13 diplomatic game, because this plays into their hands.
All right. "Wall Street Journal's" Jay Solomon — thanks so much. Thank you. undefined
点击收听单词发音
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 severed | |
v.切断,断绝( sever的过去式和过去分词 );断,裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 boycott | |
n./v.(联合)抵制,拒绝参与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 factions | |
组织中的小派别,派系( faction的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 aligned | |
adj.对齐的,均衡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 equities | |
普通股,股票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 feud | |
n.长期不和;世仇;v.长期争斗;世代结仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 bloc | |
n.集团;联盟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 fissures | |
n.狭长裂缝或裂隙( fissure的名词复数 );裂伤;分歧;分裂v.裂开( fissure的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 astute | |
adj.机敏的,精明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|