-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Another hallmark of the Obama administration is the Iran nuclear deal.
And a deadline looms1 this weekend to certify2 whether Tehran is in compliance3 and whether the agreement is in the U.S. national security interest.
But we wanted to step back to look at what the deal does and what it does not do, and what the president's decision could mean. Nick Schifrin is here to put it in context.
In 2015, the United States and a united world community made a deal with Iran.
Iran severely5 restricted its nuclear program, allowed more access to international inspectors6, and promised never to seek, develop, or acquire any nuclear weapons.
Before the deal, U.S. and Israeli intelligence believed the breakout time for Iran to build a nuclear weapon was as little as one month.
After the deal, the breakout time is at least 12 months.
In return, the U.S. and the U.N. lifted sanctions related to Iran's nuclear program worth more than $100 billion,
and promised not to discourage investment in Iran. The deal was announced by the European Union's top diplomat7, Federica Mogherini.
We delivered on what the world was hoping for, a shared commitment to peace and to join hands in order to make our world safer.
The deal's critics were unconvinced.
I know deal-making. And let me tell you, this deal is catastrophic, for America, for Israel, and for the whole of the Middle East.
The first criticism is the deal's expiry dates, or so-called sunsets.
After eight years, Iran can begin to slowly manufacture increasingly advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium.
After 15 years, Iran can start producing higher-grade uranium, and can expand its stockpile of uranium. And after 20 years, Iran can restrict international monitoring.
The deal's advocates counter that all arms deal have sunsets, and that the deal has important permanent restrictions8.
Iran is forever banned from activities that could contribute to the development of a nuclear explosive device,
and is forever required to notify inspectors if it's building a nuclear facility.
The critics also condemn9 what's not in the deal. Iran helps arm militant10 groups in the Middle East, including Hezbollah, deemed a terrorist group.
The deal doesn't prevent that. Iran launches and trades ballistic missiles. The deal doesn't prevent that.
The deal's defenders12 say it was never designed to confront those other issues, and it's better to do that confrontation13 when Iran doesn't have an active nuclear program.
But the deal does say world powers expect Iran to positively14 contribute to regional and international peace and security.
And critics argue Iran, even if it's in technical compliance, is going against that, against the so-called spirit of the deal.
We cannot abide15 by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual16 construction of a nuclear program.
So, what's next? Administration and congressional officials tell me they expect the president will not certify Iran is in compliance with the deal, based on national security grounds.
That will trigger a 60-day window, during which Congress can go vote for against snapping back sanctions, meaning reimposing nuclear-related sanctions on Iran.
That would likely kill the deal. But even the deal's most strident critics, such as Senator Tom Cotton, say Congress shouldn't kill the deal.
They want the 60-day window, so the U.S. can gain leverage17 to get Iran to change the deal, even if that takes many months.
The world needs to know we're serious, we're willing to walk away, and we're willing to reimpose sanctions, and a lot more than that.
The Trump administration wants to change all Iranian behavior. But it's not clear it's possible to do so by renegotiating the nuclear deal.
Iran says it won't renegotiate. And with the possible exception of France, none of the other countries who signed the deal want to renegotiate.
Wendy Sherman led the Obama team that negotiated the deal.
If the president doesn't certify, even if Congress doesn't snap back sanctions, which is this Kabuki smackdown,
their ability to pull off this Kabuki dance is in great question. As a result, we will isolate18 ourselves from the rest of the world.
The next few months will be dominated by uncertainty19, uncertainty what Congress will do, and uncertainty how Iran will respond to Washington's decisions.
The deadline for the president to announce his decision is Sunday. For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Nick Schifrin. undefined
点击收听单词发音
1 looms | |
n.织布机( loom的名词复数 )v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的第三人称单数 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 certify | |
vt.证明,证实;发证书(或执照)给 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 compliance | |
n.顺从;服从;附和;屈从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 inspectors | |
n.检查员( inspector的名词复数 );(英国公共汽车或火车上的)查票员;(警察)巡官;检阅官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 militant | |
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 defenders | |
n.防御者( defender的名词复数 );守卫者;保护者;辩护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 abide | |
vi.遵守;坚持;vt.忍受 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 eventual | |
adj.最后的,结局的,最终的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 leverage | |
n.力量,影响;杠杆作用,杠杆的力量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 isolate | |
vt.使孤立,隔离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|