-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Good evening and thanks for joining us. For the second day in a row, Russian President Vladimir Putin is rejecting the assertion by American intelligence agencies
that Russians meddled1 in last year's U.S. presidential election to the potential benefit of Donald Trump2.
In an excerpt3 from an interview with NBC News to be broadcast tomorrow, Putin suggests hackers4, even in the U.S., could have planted evidence to frame Russia.
Hackers can be anywhere. They can be in Russia, in Asia. There can even be hackers by the way, in the United States,
who very skillfully and professionally shifted the blame, as we say, onto Russia.
Anti-Trump demonstrators in Washington and many other cities today staged what they called "Marches for Truth", demanding answers on election meddling5 and the release of the president's tax returns.
At the same time, supporters of Mr. Trump and his decision this week to withdraw from the Paris climate change accord rallied outside the White House.
As a special counsel ramps6 up his probe into Russian hacking7 and possible collusion with the Trump campaign,
one pending8 question is why the Trump administration has considered lifting economic sanctions on and returning seized diplomatic compounds in the U.S. to Russia?
"Yahoo News" chief investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff reported on that angle this week, and joins me now from Washington.
So, let's talk a little bit about these economic sanctions. Your reporting seems to show that there was pressure from the Trump administration very early on to get these lifted.
Exactly. In its first few days, there were taskings to the State Department to develop proposals to ease tensions with Russia.
And what the Trump people were looking for were proposals to ease or lift sanctions that had been imposed by the Obama administration on Russia after its interference
intervention10 in Ukraine, and its meddling in the presidential election.
What would the U.S. get back? It was cooperation– sort of future cooperation in the fight against ISIS?
Right. That was what disturbed so many people in the State Department. These sanctions were imposed for specific reasons, as a punishment,
and without an acknowledgment of that, without an agreement by the Russians to live up to the Minsk accords in Ukraine,
to end the violence there, and acknowledge its role in the election, these were seen as unilateral concessions11 to the Russians.
Subsequently, there was actually push-back from Republican members like Lindsey Graham, who said that we shouldn't go out of our way to give them something for nothing.
There was a fierce bureaucratic12 in-fighting that took place as a result of this. Folks who got these tasking orders, people who were aware in the government,
who were aware of what the Trump White House was looking to do or exploring to do went to allies — Dan Fried, a veteran State Department diplomat9 who was the coordinator13 for U.S. sanctions policy,
was still there, still at the State Department. Tom Malinowski, who just stepped down as assistant secretary of state, and alerted them to what it looked like the Trump White House was about to do.
And then, Fried and Malinowski then went to allies on Capitol Hill — Senator McCain's office, Ben Cardin, the ranking Democrat14 on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
and prodded15 them to push legislation that would effectively block the Trump White House from doing this, to codify16 the sanctions so they could not be unilaterally lifted by the White House.
This is a part of the larger pattern, an interest or an instinct the administration has toward Russia?
Well, I think it's a big missing piece of the puzzle. We've talked a lot for months now about whether there was collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians in its meddling in the election.
We've spent a lot of time talking about those meetings during the transition — Jared Kushner, Michael Flynn meeting with the Russian ambassador and a Russian banker.
The question is, what did the Russians want or hope to get from the Trump administration? And there's no question, the number one item on their agenda was the lifting of sanctions.
That's what they were hoping to get from the Trump White House. That's what they wanted from the administration.
All right. Michael Isikoff of "Yahoo News", thanks so much for joining us. Thank you. undefined
点击收听单词发音
1 meddled | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 excerpt | |
n.摘录,选录,节录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 hackers | |
n.计算机迷( hacker的名词复数 );私自存取或篡改电脑资料者,电脑“黑客” | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 meddling | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 ramps | |
resources allocation and multiproject scheduling 资源分配和多项目的行程安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 hacking | |
n.非法访问计算机系统和数据库的活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 concessions | |
n.(尤指由政府或雇主给予的)特许权( concession的名词复数 );承认;减价;(在某地的)特许经营权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 bureaucratic | |
adj.官僚的,繁文缛节的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 coordinator | |
n.协调人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 prodded | |
v.刺,戳( prod的过去式和过去分词 );刺激;促使;(用手指或尖物)戳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 codify | |
v.将法律、法规等编成法典 | |
参考例句: |
|
|