-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
61.
I woke to a text from Jason.
Bad news.
What is it now?
The Mail on Sunday had printed the private letter Meg had written to her father. The letter that
Granny and Pa urged her to write.
February 2019.
I was in bed, Meg was lying next to me, still asleep.
I waited a bit, then broke the news to her softly.
Your father’s given your letter to the Mail.
No.
Meg, I don’t know what to say, he’s given them your letter.
That moment, for me, was decisive. About Mr. Markle, but also about the press. There had
been so many moments, but that for me was The One. I didn’t want to hear any more talk of
protocols1, tradition, strategy. Enough, I thought.
Enough.
The paper knew it was illegal to publish that letter, they knew full well, and did it anyway.
Why? Because they also knew Meg was defenseless. They knew she didn’t have the staunch
support of my family, and how else could they have known this, except from people close to the
family? Or inside the family? The papers knew that the only recourse Meg had was to sue, and she
couldn’t do that because there was only one lawyer working with the family, and that lawyer was
under the control of the Palace, and the Palace would never authorize2 him to act on Meg’s behalf.
There was nothing in that letter to be ashamed about. A daughter pleading with her father to
behave decently? Meg stood by every word. She’d always known it might be intercepted3, that one
of her father’s neighbors, or one of the paps staking out his house, might steal his post. Anything
was possible. But she never stopped to think her father would actually offer it, or that a paper
would actually take it—and print it.
And edit it. Indeed, that might have been the most galling4 thing, the way the editors cut and
pasted Meg’s words to make them sound less loving.
Seeing something so deeply personal smeared5 across the front pages, gobbled up by Britons
over their morning toast and marmalade, was invasive enough. But the pain was compounded
tenfold by the simultaneous interviews with alleged6 handwriting experts, who analyzed7 Meg’s
letter and inferred from the way she crossed her Ts or curved her Rs that she was a terrible person.
Rightward slant8? Over-emotional.
Highly stylized? Consummate9 performer.
Uneven10 baseline? No impulse control.
The look on Meg’s face as I told her about these libels rolling out…I knew my way around
grief, and there was no mistaking it—this was pure grief. She was mourning the loss of her father,
and she was also mourning the loss of her own innocence11. She reminded me in a whisper, as if
someone might be listening, that she’d taken a handwriting class in high school, and as a result
she’d always had excellent penmanship. People complimented her. She’d even used this skill at
university to earn spare money. Nights, weekends, she’d inscribed12 wedding and birthday-party
invitations, to pay the rent. Now people were trying to say that this was some kind of window into
her soul? And the window was dirty?
Tormenting13 Meghan Markle has become a national sport that shames us, said a headline in
So true. But no one was shamed, that was the problem. No one was feeling the slightest pang15
of conscience. Would they finally feel some if they caused a divorce? Or would it take another
death?
What had become of all the shame they’d felt in the late 1990s?
Meg wanted to sue. Me too. Rather, we both felt we had no choice. If we didn’t sue over this,
we said, what kind of signal would that be sending? To the press? To the world? So we conferred
again with the Palace lawyer.
We were given a runaround.
I reached out to Pa and Willy. They’d both sued the press in the past over invasions and lies.
Pa sued over so-called Black Spider Letters, his memos16 to government officials. Willy sued over
topless photos of Kate.
But both vehemently17 opposed the idea of Meg and me taking any legal action.
Why? I asked.
They hummed and hahed. The only answer I could get out of them was that it simply wasn’t
advisable. The done thing, etc.
I told Meg: You’d think we were suing a dear friend of theirs.
1 protocols | |
n.礼仪( protocol的名词复数 );(外交条约的)草案;(数据传递的)协议;科学实验报告(或计划) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 authorize | |
v.授权,委任;批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 intercepted | |
拦截( intercept的过去式和过去分词 ); 截住; 截击; 拦阻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 galling | |
adj.难堪的,使烦恼的,使焦躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 smeared | |
弄脏; 玷污; 涂抹; 擦上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 analyzed | |
v.分析( analyze的过去式和过去分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 slant | |
v.倾斜,倾向性地编写或报道;n.斜面,倾向 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 consummate | |
adj.完美的;v.成婚;使完美 [反]baffle | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 uneven | |
adj.不平坦的,不规则的,不均匀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 inscribed | |
v.写,刻( inscribe的过去式和过去分词 );内接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 tormenting | |
使痛苦的,使苦恼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 guardian | |
n.监护人;守卫者,保护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 pang | |
n.剧痛,悲痛,苦闷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 memos | |
n.备忘录( memo的名词复数 );(美)内部通知 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 vehemently | |
adv. 热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|